In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, the UK Supreme Court fundamentally changed the law of accessorial liability when it decided that the principles of joint enterprise had been misinterpreted for over thirty years. The Court abolished the head of liability known as parasitic accessory liability and replaced
Accessory Liability
โ Scribed by Paul S. Davies
- Publisher
- Hart Publishing
- Year
- 2015
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 316
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Accessory liability in the private law is of great importance. Claimants often bring claims against third parties who participate in wrongs. For example, the 'direct wrongdoer' may be insolvent, so a claimant might prefer a remedy against an accessory in order to obtain satisfactory redress. However, the law in this area has not received the attention it deserves. The criminal law recognises that any person who 'aids, abets, counsels or procures' any offence can be punished as an accessory, but the private law is more fragmented. One reason for this is a tendency to compartmentalise the law of obligations into discrete subjects, such as contract, trusts, tort and intellectual property. This book suggests that by looking across such boundaries in the private law, the nature and principles of accessory liability can be better understood and doctrinal confusion regarding the elements of liability, defences and remedies resolved.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The distillation process is one of the most employed separating applications in laboratory, technique and production. It is used for material mixtures, which have concentration differences in the thermal balance between the vapour and liquid phase. The efficiency is decisively determined by the spee