## Abstract The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) can be interpreted in the more general context of linear regression theory. The recursive filter equations are equivalent to the normal equations for a weighted least‐squares estimate that minimizes a quadratic functional. Solving the normal equations i
Accelerating the spin-up of Ensemble Kalman Filtering
✍ Scribed by Eugenia Kalnay; Shu-Chih Yang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 185 KB
- Volume
- 136
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0035-9009
- DOI
- 10.1002/qj.652
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) may have a longer spin‐up time to reach its asymptotic level of accuracy than the corresponding spin‐up time in variational methods (3D‐Var or 4D‐Var). During the spin‐up EnKF has to fulfill two independent requirements, namely that the ensemble mean be close to the true state, and that the ensemble perturbations represent the ‘errors of the day’. As a result, there are cases, such as radar observations of a severe storm, or regional forecast of a hurricane, where EnKF may spin‐up too slowly to be useful. A heuristic scheme is proposed to accelerate the spin‐up of EnKF by applying a no‐cost Ensemble Kalman Smoother, and using the observations more than once in each assimilation window during spin‐up in order to maximize the initial extraction of information. The performance of this scheme is tested with the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) implemented in a quasi‐geostrophic model, which requires a very long spin‐up time when initialized from random initial perturbations from a uniform distribution. Results show that with the new ‘running in place’ (RIP) scheme the LETKF spins up and converges to the optimal level of error faster than 3D‐Var or 4D‐Var, even in the absence of any prior information. Additional computations (2 to 12 iterations for each assimilation window) are only required during the initial spin‐up, since the scheme naturally returns to the original LETKF after spin‐up is achieved. RIP also accelerates spin‐up when the initial perturbations are drawn from a well‐tuned 3D‐Var background‐error covariance, rather than being uniform noise, and fewer iterations and RIP cycles are required than in the case without such prior information. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has been widely used as a sequential data assimilation method, primarily due to its ease of implementation resulting from replacing the covariance evolution in the traditional Kalman filter (KF) by an approximate Monte Carlo ensemble sampling. In this paper rigorous ana
## Abstract In this study, a new Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) algorithm called EnKF with growing‐error correction (EnKF‐GEC) is developed for minimizing the growing component of the forecast error; for this purpose, prospective observations are assimilated using empirical singular vectors (ESVs).
## Abstract The spatial characteristics of ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) sensitive area predictions (SAPs) are explored using ensemble forecasts from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts for the period of the 2003 North Atlantic THORPEX Regional Campaign. The ensemble si
## Abstract Covariance inflation plays an important role within the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) in preventing filter divergence and handling model errors. However the inflation factor needs to be tuned and tuning a parameter in the EnKF is expensive. Previous studies have adaptively estimated the
## Abstract The ensemble sensitivity method proposed by Liu and Kalnay (2008) to estimate the impact of observations on reducing forecast error is shown to have a slight error and is corrected here. The corrected formula captures the actual forecast error reduction better and removes the positive b