✦ LIBER ✦

Abnormal cervical smear: A sign of disseminated breast cancer

✍ Scribed by Sabrina L. Lince; Joep Douma; Anne J.M. Wiersma-Van Tilburg; Arjan A. Kraayenbrink

Book ID: 116435152
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 103 KB
Volume: 141
Category: Article
ISSN: 0301-2115
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.017

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervi

Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear

✍ M. J. CAMPION; J. R. BROWN; D. J. MCCANCE; W. ATIA; R. EDWARDS; J. CUZICK; A. SI 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 501 KB

The psychosocial impact of an abnormal c

The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result

✍ Mélanie Drolet; Marc Brisson; Elizabeth Maunsell; Eduardo L. Franco; François Co 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

Risk of invasive cervical cancer in rela

Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results

✍ Lena Silfverdal; Levent Kemetli; Bengt Andrae; Pär Sparén; Walter Ryd; Joakim Di 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 259 KB

A Quality Control System Involving Peer

A Quality Control System Involving Peer Review of Abnormal Cervical Smears

✍ D. PALLI; M. CONFORTINI; A. BIGGERI; A. RUSSO; P. CARIAGGI; F. CAROZZI; P. A. MI 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 564 KB

Metastatic lobular carcinoma of breast p

Metastatic lobular carcinoma of breast presenting on a routine cervical smear

✍ S. Agrawal; A. Jeyarajah; D. Al-Okati; U. O. Igbokwe 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 458 KB

Interobserver variability of cervical sm

Interobserver variability of cervical smears with squamous-cell abnormalities: A philadelphia study

✍ Nancy A. Young; Sonya Naryshkin; Barbara F. Atkinson; Hormoz Ehya; Prabodh K. Gu 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 511 KB

## Abstract The reproducibility of reporting squamous lesions by the Bethesda System (TBS) was evaluated by distributing 20 slides to be classified among 5 panelists considered experts in the field of cytopathology. Four cases were chosen for their classic morphology and the remainder were foreseen