Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions
β Scribed by Mr T. T. Irvin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 649 KB
- Volume
- 76
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0007-1323
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
In an audit of 1190 emergency admissions with abdominal pain (1166 patients) in a general surgical unit, the diagnosis was non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) in 415 (35 per cent), acute appendicitis in 200 (17-per cent) and intestinal obstruction in 176 (15 per cent). The largest number of admissions occurred in the age groups 10β29 years (31 per cent) and 60β79 years (29 per cent). Surgical operations were performed in 551 patients (47 per cent) and there was a 16 per cent incidence of unnecessary appendicectomy (22 per cent in the age group 20β29 years). Fifty-one deaths resulted in a 30-day hospital mortality rate of 4Β·4 per cent and a perioperative mortality rate of 8 per cent. The mortality rate increased significantly in patients aged β₯60 years, and patients aged 80β89 years had a perioperative mortality rate of 20 per cent. The causes of perioperative death included laparotomy for inoperable disease (28 per cent), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (23 per cent), perforated peptic ulcer (16 per cent) and colonic resections (14 per cent). The perioperative mortality rates for ruptured aneurysm and perforated ulcer were 71 and 23 per cent respectively. The duration of inpatient stay increased significantly with the age of the patients, including those with NSAP. The results of the study indicate a need to review the methods of management of ruptured aortic aneurysm and perforated peptic ulcer, the methods of diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly in young females, and the factors that determine the duration of stay of patients suffering from NSAP.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Acute flank pain is a frequent clinical presentation encountered in emergency departments, and a workβup for obstructive urolithiasis in this setting is a common indication for computed tomography (CT). However, imaging alternatives to CT for the evaluation of renal colic are warranted