I read with interest the superb review/AAEM minimonograph number 26, ''The Electrodiagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome'' by Stevens. I was puzzled by his statement, ''It is not wise, however, to do multiple different sensitive NCSs in the same patient, because of the risk of a type I error (normal pa
AAEM minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
β Scribed by J. Clarke Stevens
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 99 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0148-639X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is reviewed, including discussions of old and new techniques of motor and sensory nerve conduction, anomalous innervation, and needle electrode examination. A variety of sensitive nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are available for the evaluation of a patient with suspected CTS. For any particular patient, the NCS method chosen by the clinical neurophysiologist may vary for a number of reasons, including the severity of the deficit and the presence of superimposed conditions.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
rable to that obtained using the microneurographic technique. 4, Being less affected by the conduction time of the afferent somatosensory fiber and by central processing, SuCV may be a useful parameter with which to evaluate efferent sudomotor function. Denis Λlic Λet al., however, noted that it is
Correction factors exist to allow for the dramatic effect that temperature has on nerve conduction study parameters. However, these are based on normal nerves in normal individuals and may not be appropriate in the diseased nerve setting. Our clinical study showed that in carpal tunnel syndrome, the