𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A visual field quantification system for the Goldmann Perimeter

✍ Scribed by Tomohiro Odaka; Kimihiko Fujisawa; Kouhei Akazawa; Maki Sakamoto; Naoko Kinukawa; Tatsuro Kamakura; Yuko Nishioka; Hidetoshi Itasaka; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Yoshiaki Nose

Publisher
Springer US
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
413 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-5598

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter f
Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma
✍ Chul Hong; Yoshiaki Kitazawa; Shiroaki Shirato πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 441 KB

The efficacy of automated suprathreshold perimetry with Fieldmaster automated perimeter (model 101 PR and 200) was evaluated in the screening for very early glaucomatous visual field defects which failed to be detected with kinetic perimetry using a Goldmann perimeter. Evaluation of 117 eyes with el

A recurrent system incorporating charact
A recurrent system incorporating characteristics of the visual system: a model for the function of backward neural connections in the visual system
✍ K. Okajima πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 629 KB

A recurrent system is constructed in order to investigate the role of the backward neural connections found in the primate visual system. The system incorporates a layer to perform localized spatial frequency analysis of input images, a function which has been assumed to take place in the primary vi

A comparison of unweighted and fluctuati
A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28Β° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
✍ A. T. Funkhouser; F. Fankhauser πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 393 KB

The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that the