The classification of clinical problems, such as AIDS, requires choices. Choices are made on epistemic (i.e., knowledge-based) and non-epistemic (i.e., action-based) grounds. That is, the ways in which we classify clinical problems, such as AIDS, involve a balancing of different understandings of cl
β¦ LIBER β¦
A variety of criteria for setting test limits
β Scribed by W. Albers; W. C. M. Kallenberg; G. R. J. Arts
- Book ID
- 108542378
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 198 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0039-0402
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Negotiating criteria and setting limits:
β
Mary Ann Gardell Cutter
π
Article
π
1990
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 461 KB
Setting Eligibility Criteria for a Care-
β
Christine T. Cigolle; Kenneth M. Langa; Mohammed U. Kabeto; Caroline S. Blaum
π
Article
π
2005
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 157 KB
Home testing for HIV infection in resour
β
Ishani Ganguli; Ingrid V. Bassett; Krista L. Dong; Rochelle P. Walensky
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer
π
English
β 240 KB
Verification limits for test-ban treaty
β
Glenn, Lewis A.
π
Article
π
1984
π
Nature Publishing Group
π
English
β 520 KB
Development criteria for a Benchmark tes
β
Kurt BΓΆhm
π
Article
π
1982
π
Elsevier Science
β 547 KB
Criteria for choosing a rough set model
β
Joseph P. Herbert; JingTao Yao
π
Article
π
2009
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 576 KB
One of the challenges a decision maker faces in using rough sets is to choose a suitable rough set model for data analysis. We investigate how two rough set models, the Pawlak model and the probabilistic model, influence the decision goals of a user. Two approaches use probabilities to define region