𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

A Typological Perspective on Latvian Grammar

✍ Scribed by Andra Kalnaca


Publisher
De Gruyter Open Poland
Year
2014
Tongue
English
Leaves
198
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Theoretical studies of Latvian grammar have a great deal to offer to contemporary linguistics. Although traditionally Lithuanian has been the most widely studied Baltic language in diachronic and synchronic linguistics alike, Latvian has a number of distinctive features that can prove valuable both for historical, and perhaps even more so, for synchronic language research. Therefore, at the very least, contemporary typological, areal, and language contact studies involving Baltic languages should account for data from Latvian. Typologically, Latvian grammar is a classic Indo-European (Baltic) system with well-developed inflection and derivation. However, it also bears certain similarities to the Finno-Ugric languages, which can be reasonably explained by its areal and historical background. This applies, for example, to the mood system and its connections with modality and evidentiality in Latvian, also to the correlation between aspect and quantity as manifested in verbal and nominal (case) forms. The relations between debitive mood, certain constructions with reflexive verbs, and voice in Latvian are intriguing examples of unusual morphosyntactic features.
Accordingly, the book focuses on the following topics: case system and declension (with emphasis on the polyfunctionality of case forms), gender, conjugation, tense and personal forms, aspect, mood, modality and evidentiality, reflexive verbs, and voice. The examples included in this book have been taken from the Balanced Corpus of Modern Latvian (Lidzsvarots musdienu latvieΕ‘u valodas tekstu korpuss, available at www.korpuss.lv), www.google.lv, mass media, and fiction texts (see the List of language sources) without regard to relative frequency ratios.

Latvian Grammar


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Typological Perspective on Latvian Gra
✍ Andra Kalnaca πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2014 πŸ› De Gruyter Open Poland 🌐 English

<p>Theoretical studies of Latvian grammar have a great deal to offer to contemporary linguistics. Although traditionally Lithuanian has been the most widely studied Baltic language in diachronic and synchronic linguistics alike, Latvian has a number of distinctive features that can prove valuable bo

Argument Selectors: A new perspective on
✍ Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (editor), Balthasar Bickel (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2019 πŸ› John Benjamins Publishing Company 🌐 English

Capitalizing on the by now widely accepted idea of the construction-specific and language-specific nature of grammatical relations, the editors of the volume developed a modern framework for systematically capturing all sorts of variations in grammatical relations. The central concepts of this frame

The Grammatical Voice in Japanese: A Typ
✍ Junichi Toyota πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Cambridge Scholars Publishing 🌐 English

This monograph investigates how Japanese employs different structures found in the grammatical voice, both synchronically and diachronically. The Japanese voice system, especially the passive voice, has provided much interesting data for typological comparison, and Japanese examples are often cited

Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological
✍ Carmen Jany πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› University of California Press 🌐 English

<p>The Chimariko language, now extinct, was spoken in Trinity County, California. This reference grammar, based on data collected by Harrington in the 1920's, represents the most comprehensive description of the language. Written from a functional-typological perspective this work also examines lang

Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Gra
✍ Bernd Kortmann πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Mouton De Gruyter 🌐 English

In what ways can dialectologists and language typologists profit from each others' work when looking across the fence? This is the guiding question of this volume, which involves follow-up questions such as: How can dialectologists profit from adopting the large body of insights in and hypotheses on