A systematic review and meta-analysis of Macroplastique for treating female stress urinary incontinence
โ Scribed by Ghoniem, Gamal M.; Miller, Christopher J.
- Book ID
- 118780239
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 303 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0937-3462
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Introduction and hypothesis
Macroplastiqueยฎ (polydimethylsiloxane injection) is a minimally invasive urethral bulking agent with global clinical literature describing its use over 20ย years. This study critically assessed the safety and effectiveness outcomes for adult women treated with Macroplastique for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A systematic review of the scientific literature from 1990 to 2010 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to quantitatively summarize the safety and effectiveness of Macroplastique for female SUI. A total of 958 patients from 23 cohorts were eligible for inclusion and were analyzed. Random-effects models were used to estimate the improvement and cure rates following treatment at three time periods: short-term (<6ย months), mid-term (6โ18ย months), and long-term (>18ย months). Expanded models assessed the effect of reinjection rate on successful treatment outcomes. Adverse event rates were aggregated and reported.
Results
Improvement rates were 75ย % [95ย % confidence interval (CI), 69โ81] in the short-term, 73ย % (95ย % CI, 62โ83) in the mid-term, and 64ย % (95ย % CI, 57โ71) long-term. Cure/dry rates were 43ย % (95ย % CI, 33โ54), 37ย % (95ย % CI, 28โ46), and 36ย % (95ย % CI, 27โ46) over the same respective follow-up periods. Higher study reinjection rates were associated with improved long-term SUI outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions
This quantitative review supports Macroplastique as an effective, durable, and safe treatment option for female SUI. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that long-term therapeutic benefit is frequently maintained, with some patients requiring reinjection.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES