A survey of the views of geriatric psychiatrists in the United Kingdom on the use of electroconvulsive therapy to treat physically ill people

✍ Scribed by S. M. Benbow; A. Shah

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2002
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 61 KB
• Volume: 17
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0885-6230
• DOI: 10.1002/gps.737

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Background

One of the main concerns about ECT is its use for people with concurrent medical illnesses. Geriatric psychiatrists are more often likely to encounter this situation in working with older age groups. Drawing on the collective experience of all UK geriatric psychiatrists may allow a better understanding of the use of ECT for people with major medical illness.

Methods

A postal questionnaire was used to seek the views of all consultant geriatric psychiatrists in the UK on the use of ECT in the presence of major illness. The questionnaire was developed from previous literature on the subject, a previous pilot study, published guidelines and clinical experience of the authors.

Results

Geriatric psychiatrists most often favour bilateral ECT. They are likely to carry out physical examination, chest X‐ray, ECG, haemoglobin estimation, urea and electrolytes, thyroid and liver function tests in medically ill people before considering ECT. They are more likely to change their ECT assessment procedures when dealing with medical illness, rather than any other aspect of treatment, and are unlikely to change any aspect of ECT treatment in someone of advanced age.

Conclusions

Geriatric psychiatrists see their roles in relation to ECT as primarily that of assessment, and rely on others to advise on anaesthetic drug use, treatment technique, concurrent drug treatment and post‐ECT management. It is important that the ECT consultant and ECT anaesthetist are aware of their role and prepared to offer appropriate advice. The role of the ECT consultant in relation to the responsible medical officer requires clarification. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.