A survey of the record-keeping practices of clinical psychologists
β Scribed by Joyce M. Scaife; Michael Pomerantz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 286 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1063-3995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The current paper describes the results of a questionnaire survey of the record-keeping practices of clinical psychologists working in one NHS region in the UK. Issues explored include the reasons given for keeping case-notes; the content of notes; security, access, retrieval and destruction of notes; requests for access to notes and knowledge of notekeeping policy. The analysis of data includes a breakdown by years in profession and by speciality.
The results are based on 123 returns and indicate some commonly held views and practice, for example that note-keeping is generally regarded as a requirement of professional practice, that notes act for the majority of respondents as an aide meΓmoire and that clinical psychologists almost universally keep their notes in a specific psychology file even if they also keep notes elsewhere. The results also show much individual diversity and uncertainty as to what constitutes good practice.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Three separate experiments each involving the comparison of 20 high scorers on the Manifest Anxiety Scale with 20 low scorers show that when making repeated judgments of the amount of confusion exhibited in schizophrenic test responses the high anxious group always exhibits an initial lower inter-ju