A survey of physicians' attitudes to transfusion practice in critically ill patients in the UK

✍ Scribed by Harsha Boralessa; M. P. Rao; C. Morgan; N. Soni; D. R. Goldhill; S. J. Brett; Hari Boralessa

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2002
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 469 KB
• Volume: 57
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0003-2409
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02509_1.x

✦ Synopsis

Summary We performed a postal survey of Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists with a special interest in obstetric practice, about their beliefs regarding aseptic precautions for insertion of an epidural catheter in the labour ward. Of the 435 consultant anaesthetists surveyed, 367 responded (84%), revealing a wide variation in practice. It was not thought to be essential practice to remove a watch before washing hands by 51 respondents (14%), to wear a facemask by 105 (29%) or to wear a sterile gown by 45 (12%). Three anaesthetists (1%) did not believe sterile gloves were essential. However, all respondents indicated that an antiseptic skin preparation was essential. Our results raise questions regarding an acceptable standard of aseptic practice for the insertion of an epidural catheter in labour and we propose a minimal standard of essential precautions.