A simple proof of the characterization of antipodal graphs
β Scribed by Garry Johns
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 88 KB
- Volume
- 128
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The antipodal graph A(G) of a graph G is defined as the graph on the same vertex set as G with two vertices being adjacent in A(G) if the distance between them in G is the diameter of G. (If G is disconnected then we define &am(G) = co.)
Aravamudhan and Rajendran [l, 21 gave the following characterization of antipo-da1 graphs. Theorem 1. A graph G is an antipodal graph ifand only ifit is the antipodal graph of its complement CT.
The authors verified this indirectly by describing those graphs which are not antipodal graphs. In addition, they proved the following lemma which we will also use. The proof is straightforward and thus omitted.
Lemma 2. A(G) = G if and only if diam(G) = 2 or if G is disconnected and the components of G are complete graphs.
In [2] these same authors observed that if H is a connected graph with diam(H) > 2, then A(H) = A(W), where H' is the graph on the same vertex set such that two vertices
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We give a proof of Guenin's theorem characterizing weakly bipartite graphs by not having an odd-K 5 minor. The proof curtails the technical and case-checking parts of Guenin's original proof.
Using a representation of finite graphs by direct products we prove the theorem given in the title in a very simple way. Moreover, we introduce a dimension of a graph analogous to the Dushnik-Miller dimension of a partially ordered se:.