Wz give a new proof of a theorem of Bondy and Welsh. Our proof is simpler than previous ones in that it makes no use of Hall's theorem on tht: existence of a transversal of a family of sets.
A short proof that matching matroids are transversal
โ Scribed by Eberhard Triesch
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 165 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0893-9659
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
We present an elementary proof of the well-known theorem of E&nor& and Fkdkerson that a matroid is a matching matroid if and only if it is transversal. Suppose G = (V, E) is a simple graph. It is well-known that match(G), the collection of all X C V which are covered by some matching in G, is the system of independent sets of a matroid which (following Welsh [l]) we again denote by match(G). For A c V, let match(G, A) denote the restriction of match(G) to A. A matroid M is called a matching matroid if there exist G and A as above such that M = match(G,A). A matroid M is called transversal if there exist a bipartite graph H and a subset A of one color class of H such that M = match(H,A). Edmonds and Fulkerson, who studied matching problems because of their rich applications in Combinatorial Optimization (see, e.g., [2]), introduced matching matroids in 1965 (cf. [3]) and proved the following striking fact: THEOREM 1. A matroid is a matching matroid if and only if it is transversal.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A principal transversal matroid is one containing a basis which spans all cyclic flats. A matroid M is the basis intersection of matroids M1,.. โข, Mk if the bases of M are precisely the common bases of M1,..., Mk. Bondy and Welsh [2], Brualdi [3] and Bixby [1] have shown that every matroid is the ba
We give a short proof of the following basic fact in matching theory: in a bipartite graph the maximum size of a matching equals the minimum size of a node cover.