๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A REVIEW OF RATS v4.2: BENCHMARKING NUMERICAL ACCURACY

โœ Scribed by B. D. McCULLOUGH


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
173 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0883-7252

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


I have used RATS (Regression Analysis of Time Series; Doan, 1994) as my primary econometrics package for over ten years. In the early days it was extremely frustrating; it was user-hostile, easily accessible only to experienced programmers, the manual was often more confusing than helpful, and it was almost exclusively oriented toward time-series analysis. I persisted nonetheless because it was (and still is, to my knowledge) the only econometrics package which supports frequency domain analysis in more than a purely automatic fashion. The current version bears little resemblance to its predecessors: RATS is now user-friendly, well documented, and does much more than time series. However, RATS, like many econometrics packages, makes insucient eort to assure the user that its results are accurate. Therefore this review will focus on the issue of whether RATS does produce accurate results.

Typical software reviews, unfortunately, tend to focus on the transparent, i.e. the userinterface, to the complete exclusion of the latent, i.e. what the computer is actually doing, crunching numbers. This is rather surprising, since we should ยฎrst inquire whether the program gives an accurate answer, and only then worry about how easy it is to get that answer. Unfortunately, almost all reviews of econometric software completely omit any reference to numerical accuracy, despite the existence of entire collections of benchmarks such as those proposed by . I surveyed three journals which regularly publish software reviews (International Journal of Forecasting, Economic Journal, and Journal of Applied Econometrics) for the years 1990ยฑ95. Of more than seventy reviews, only three mentioned numerical accuracy, and only one actually employed a benchmark regression (he used the Lachenbruck tests). This general inattention to numerical accuracy may convey the impression that there are no such problems, when nothing could be farther from the truth: the statistical/econometric software has not been written which does not have numerical deยฎciencies.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Review of GAUSS for Windows, including i
โœ H. D. Vinod ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 157 KB

The importance of Aptech's (1999) GAUSS programming language for applied econometrics is widely accepted. A fresh look is needed due to the rapidly changing computing environment involving higher speeds, lower costs, Windows and the Internet. Accordingly, this review focuses on (1) GAUSS for Windows

A comparative numerical review of cracke
โœ C. Petit; A. Vergne; X. Zhang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 893 KB

The prediction of the behaviour of cracked structures submitted to various kinds of actions is an importa~at problem for their safety; therefore, it is necessary to have a good knowledge of the possibility for an existing crack to growth and, if it is the case, in which direction. The fracture mecha

Review of numerical special relativistic
โœ D. E. A. van Odyck ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 223 KB

## Abstract This paper gives an overview of numerical methods for special relativistic hydrodynamics (SRHD). First, a short summary of special relativity is given. Next, the SRHD equations are introduced. The exact solution for the SRHD Riemann problem is described. This solution is used in a Godun