𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)

✍ Scribed by Noralane M. Lindor; Lucia Guidugli; Xianshu Wang; Maxime P. Vallée; Alvaro N. A. Monteiro; Sean Tavtigian; David E. Goldgar; Fergus J. Couch


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
262 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
1059-7794

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative "posterior probability model" for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Classification of missense variants of u
✍ A. Osorio; R.L. Milne; E. Honrado; A. Barroso; O. Diez; R. Salazar; M. de la Hoy 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 189 KB 👁 1 views

Classification of rare missense variants in disease susceptibility genes as neutral or disease-causing is important for genetic counseling. Different criteria are used to help classify such variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2; however, the strongest evidence tends to come from segregation analysis and obser

ENIGMA—Evidence-based network for the in
✍ Amanda B. Spurdle; Sue Healey; Andrew Devereau; Frans B. L. Hogervorst; Alvaro N 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB 👁 2 views

As genetic testing for predisposition to human diseases has become an increasingly common practice in medicine, the need for clear interpretation of the test results is apparent. However, for many disease genes, including the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a significant fraction