## Abstract We compared the susceptibility of two emotional intelligence (EI) tests to faking. In a laboratory study using a within‐subjects design, participants completed the EQ‐i and the MSCEIT in two sessions. In the first session (i.e., the ‘applicant condition’), participants were given a job
A review and critique of emotional intelligence measures
✍ Scribed by Jeffrey M. Conte
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 67 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.319
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Emotional intelligence measures vary widely in both their content and in their method of assessment. In particular, emotional intelligence measures tend to use either a self‐report personality‐based approach, an informant approach, or an ability‐based assessment procedure. In this paper, the measurement and psychometric properties of four of the major emotional intelligence measures (Emotional Competence Inventory, Emotional Quotient Inventory, Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale, Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test) are reviewed, the comparability of these measures is examined, and some conclusions and suggestions for future research on emotional intelligence measures are provided. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The study addressed two findings in the creativity literature that show, on the one hand, that bipolar disorder and other clinical dysfunctions are overrepresented among eminently creative people, and that positive affect is positively associated with creativity. The central hypothesis