𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A retrospective study of the relative utility of electrophoresis, immunoelectrophoresis, immunofixation, and nephelometry in the investigation of serum proteins

✍ Scribed by Mark L. Salkie


Book ID
103041327
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
388 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-9120

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Objectives:

To assess the relative value of visual inspection of protein electrophoresis patterns, immunoelectrophoresis, immunofixation, and specific protein quantitation in the investigation of serum proteins.

Design and methods:

A retrospective study of protein results on 372 sera analyzed by electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis. a subsection of specimens (276) also had immunoglobulin quantitation by immunonephelometry and 30 were studied by immunofixation.

Results:

Total gamma globulin levels were correctly assessed visually in 84.4% of cases. discrete bands seen visually were mainly monoclonal in 74 of 80 (92.5%). six monoclonal proteins were not detected visually. twenty-five monoclonal proteins required immunofixation for typing, and 60 were typed by immunoelectrophoresis. the visual assessment of the level of normal immunoglobulins in the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy was correct in 58% of cases.

Conclusions:

The majority of monoclonal gammopathies could be evaluated by a combination of protein electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis. except for quantitating monoclonal immunoglobins, protein electrophoresis was unreliable as a quantitative procedure and nephelometry was preferred.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES