A retrospective study of the relative utility of electrophoresis, immunoelectrophoresis, immunofixation, and nephelometry in the investigation of serum proteins
β Scribed by Mark L. Salkie
- Book ID
- 103041327
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 388 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-9120
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Objectives:
To assess the relative value of visual inspection of protein electrophoresis patterns, immunoelectrophoresis, immunofixation, and specific protein quantitation in the investigation of serum proteins.
Design and methods:
A retrospective study of protein results on 372 sera analyzed by electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis. a subsection of specimens (276) also had immunoglobulin quantitation by immunonephelometry and 30 were studied by immunofixation.
Results:
Total gamma globulin levels were correctly assessed visually in 84.4% of cases. discrete bands seen visually were mainly monoclonal in 74 of 80 (92.5%). six monoclonal proteins were not detected visually. twenty-five monoclonal proteins required immunofixation for typing, and 60 were typed by immunoelectrophoresis. the visual assessment of the level of normal immunoglobulins in the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy was correct in 58% of cases.
Conclusions:
The majority of monoclonal gammopathies could be evaluated by a combination of protein electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis. except for quantitating monoclonal immunoglobins, protein electrophoresis was unreliable as a quantitative procedure and nephelometry was preferred.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES