✦ LIBER ✦

A reply to: The myth and reality of disability prevalence: Measuring disability for research and service

✍ Scribed by Barbara M. Altman

Book ID: 119227029
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 79 KB
Volume: 4
Category: Article
ISSN: 1936-6574
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.04.002

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to A reply to: The myth and realit

Reply to A reply to: The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service

✍ Suzanne McDermott; Margaret A. Turk 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

The myth and reality of disability preva

The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service

✍ Suzanne McDermott; Margaret A. Turk 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 116 KB

The meaning of research on disability an

The meaning of research on disability and rehabilitation for social services

✍ Aleksander Hulek 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 260 KB

At present, we have at our disposal an enormous amount of research results on disability, on disabled persons themselves, and on medical, vocational and social rehabilitation.

Validity of the Neck Disability Index an

Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain

✍ Mark Chan Ci En; Dean A. Clair; Stephen J. Edmondston 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

Trends in the prevalence of disability a

Trends in the prevalence of disability and chronic conditions among the older population: implications for survey design and measurement of disability

✍ Xingyan Wen 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

Quality of Life Measurement and People w

Quality of Life Measurement and People with Intellectual Disabilities: a Reply to Cummins

✍ Chris Hatton; Alastair Ager 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB

This paper continues an exchange concerning quality of life measurement and people with intellectual disabilities. It addresses the continuing debate concerning three major issues: the utility of measuring subjective well‐being in assessing service quality; the validity of quality of life as a const