Comments on the reply of R.S. Dietz and
โ
A. R. Crawford
๐
Article
๐
1979
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 105 KB
The authors state in their third sentence that the paper is 'a new attempt to discredit the reality of meteoritic impact structures on earth ..... '. That this is untrue will be apparent to anyone who reads the first sentence of my second paragraph, in which I say that '. .... the impact hypothesis