✦ LIBER ✦

A reply to Professors Maasoumi and Phillips

✍ Scribed by David F. Hendry

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 651 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0304-4076
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90002-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Professors Pritchard and Smith

✍ Robert Paul Wolff 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

A reply to professor Holmes

✍ Seymour B. Sarason 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 403 KB

A reply to professor Abelson

✍ Michael Lockwood 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB

A reply to the note of professors prigog

A reply to the note of professors prigogine and van rysselberghe

✍ J.L. Finck 📂 Article 📅 1949 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 190 KB

These two last formulas show how the affinity depends on pressure and temperature and how the affinity can be calculated. We thus see not only that dS is indeed a total differential but also that the conditions making it a total differential lead, in De Donder's method, to interesting new formulas.

On idealization: A reply to Professor Ki

On idealization: A reply to Professor Kirschenmann

✍ Leszek Nowak 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 490 KB

Reply to Professor Niermeijer and Dr. Lo

Reply to Professor Niermeijer and Dr. Los

✍ ten Kate, Leo P. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 859 B 👁 2 views

It hurts to be accused of paternalism. Nevertheless, since my intention was to stir up some discussion on the subject of disclosure of prenatally established carrier status, I welcome the reaction of Prof. Niermeijer and Dr. Los. They argue that disclosure ''will enable parents to deal with the gen