𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A reply to G. H. Tattersall's discussion on assessment of the “rheoplasticity” of concretes

✍ Scribed by Mario Collepardi

Book ID
107727974
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
90 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-8846

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to a discussion by G.H. Tattersall
Reply to a discussion by G.H. Tattersall of “Study of fresh concrete flow curves”
✍ Velimir Ukraincik 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 40 KB

I appreciate the comments and information given by Dr. Tattersall about the part of my paper regarding the results from rotating hook viscometer. In reply, I would like to emphasize some data about the method of measurement and offer the following comments.

A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt
A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt of the paper “Young's modulus of concrete reconsidered”
✍ J.M. Torrenti; C. Boulay; C. Puch 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

I appreciate the paper and results, but cannot agree with the authors that the results are basically different than those which I obtained many years ago and which were published in references 5,6, and 7. I have found that the values of strain in the central part of a compressed specimen were a bit