✦ LIBER ✦

A reply to G. Craig Rosevear

✍ Scribed by Charles Betsey

Book ID: 112827183
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 40 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 0034-6446
DOI: 10.1007/bf02689525

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A reply to S. Craig Moore

✍ James N. Johnstone; Hugh Philp 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB

REPLY TO DR. DAVID CRAIG

✍ Allen W. Burton; Madhuri Are; Mikhail Fukshansky 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB

A pox on all compromises: reply to Craig

A pox on all compromises: reply to Craig (1999)

✍ David Myers 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

Kalām cosmological arguments: Reply to p

Kalām cosmological arguments: Reply to professor Craig

✍ Graham Oppy 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 625 KB

Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to

Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig

✍ L. NATHAN OAKLANDER 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB

On the impossibility of an infinite past

On the impossibility of an infinite past: A reply to Craig

✍ Julian Wolfe 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB

In my article, "Infinite Regress and the Cosmological Argument" (International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 1971, pp. 246-249), I argue that no defender of an argument to God as a first cause can consistently object to the possibility of an infinite past on the grounds that an infinite ti