✦ LIBER ✦

A reply to ‘comments on the gamma-ray burst catalog’ of Laroset al.

✍ Scribed by E. P. Mazets; S. V. Golenetskii

Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 262 KB
Volume: 88
Category: Article
ISSN: 0004-640X
DOI: 10.1007/bf00649004

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on the gamma-ray burst catalog

Comments on the gamma-ray burst catalog of Mazetset al.(1981a)

✍ J. G. Laros; W. D. Evans; E. E. Fenimore; R. W. Klebesadel 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 224 KB

Comments on the gamma-ray burst logN>S)

Comments on the gamma-ray burst logN>S) — LogSpoint of Beurleet al.

✍ Mark C. Jennings 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 212 KB

Impact of a gamma-ray burst on the Schum

Impact of a gamma-ray burst on the Schumann resonance

✍ A. P. Nickolaenko; I. G. Kudintseva; O. Pechonaya; M. Hayakawa; T. Nakamura; Ya. 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 965 KB

Observation of a strong gamma-ray burst

Observation of a strong gamma-ray burst on the spacelab 2 mission

✍ G.J. Fishman; W.S. Paciesas; C.A. Meegan; R.B. Wilson 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 309 KB

Cyclotron lines—A possible clue to the o

Cyclotron lines—A possible clue to the origin of gamma ray bursts

✍ Krishna M. V. Apparao; S. M. Chitre 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 129 KB

Comments on the thick-target interpretat

Comments on the thick-target interpretation of solar X-ray burst ‘stereo’ observations

✍ A. L. Mackinnon 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 220 KB

The erroneous electron energy loss rate of Brown et al. (1983), used in their interpretation of multi-spacecraft hard X-ray observations, is corrected. The inference of column depth in the occulted source is repeated, mostly with only slightly different results. Additionally, it is pointed out that