We present a conceptual framework for the role of the hippocampus and its afferent and efferent structures in rodent navigation. Our proposal is compatible with the behavioral, neurophysiological, anatomical, and neuropharmacological literature, and suggests a number of practical experiments that co
A relational model of cognitive maps
✍ Scribed by B. CHAIB-DRAA; J. DESHARNAIS
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 401 KB
- Volume
- 49
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1071-5819
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A useful tool for causal reasoning is the language of cognitive maps developed by political scientists to analyse, predict and understand decisions. Although, this language is based on simple inference rules and its semantics is ad hoc, it has many attractive aspects and has been found useful in many applications: administrative sciences, game theory, information analysis, popular political developments, electrical circuits analysis, cooperative man-machines, distributed group-decision support and adaptation and learning, etc. In this paper, we show how cognitive maps can be viewed in the context of relation algebra, and how this algebra provides a semantic foundation that helps to develop a computational tool using the language of cognitive maps.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article presents an agent-based fuzzy cognitive map (ABFCM) developed injecting the concept of multi-agent system (MAS) into the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM). Fuzzy cognitive map is used for qualitative modeling and simulation. Compared to the FCM, the ABFCM enables different inference algorithms
## Abstract Dysfunctional guilt is a prominent feature of combat‐related, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present article describes a model of combat‐related guilt that distinguishes guilt types on the basis of specific false assumptions and errors of logic that are frequently associated
The authors propose a person‐centered relational framework in which C. R. Rogers's (1957) core conditions remain the primary catalyst of therapeutic change and cognitive‐behavioral work is accomplished while adhering to person‐centered principles. Important ideas asserted include the following: Cogn