𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Ratio Estimator of the Kappa Index of Agreement Between Two Observers

✍ Scribed by Dr. C. N. Bouza


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
213 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The kappa index ie usually used for measuring the agreement between two observere when the scale ie nominal. A modifioation of Cohen's kappa index waa given by Krauth. The new estimator was biased and ita large sample variance was obtained. An alternative estimator is developed here It is a ratio eetimator and ita mean square error is derived. A comparison with Cohen's estimator and aauth's one ie given by the exemplea ueed in the paper of Krauth.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of self-reported cellular t
✍ Joachim SchΓΌz; Christoffer Johansen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 74 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Epidemiologic studies on adverse health effects of cellular telephone use have assessed exposure either by self‐reported use based on questionnaire data or by using data on subscriptions for a cellular telephone provided by network operators. With the latter approach, subjects are miscl

Bivariate GARCH estimation of the optima
✍ Tae H. Park; Lorne N. Switzer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 385 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

2Cecchetti, Cumby, and Figlewski (1988) apply ARCH in estimating an optimal futures hedge with Treasury bonds. Baillie and Myers (199 1) and Myers (1991) examine commodity futures and report improvements in hedging performance over the constant hedge approach by following a dynamic strategy based o

A note on the use of the intraclass corr
✍ J.M. Bland; D.G. Altman πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 376 KB

The intraclass correlation coefficient (r,) has been advocated as a statistic for assessing agreement or consistency between two methods of measurement, in conjunction with a significance test of the difference between means obtained by the two methods. We show that neither technique is appropriate