๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A randomized trial comparing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt with variceal band ligation in the prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices

โœ Scribed by R Jalan; E H Forrest; A J Stanley; D N Redhead; J Forbes; J F Dillon; A J MacGilchrist; N D Finlayson; P C Hayes


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
204 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-9139

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The aim of this study was to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) with variceal band ligation (VBL) in the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Fifty-eight patients with cirrhosis who presented with the first episode of esophageal variceal hemorrhage were randomized to TIPSS (31) or VBL (27), 24 hours after control of bleeding. Shunt function was assessed after 1 month and then at 6 monthly intervals thereafter. VBL was performed weekly until variceal eradication, and then at 3 months, 6 months, and yearly thereafter. Mean follow-up in the TIPSS group was 15.7 (+/-10.2) months; in the VBL group, it was 16.8 (+/-10.9) months. Results for rebleeding and mortality were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and using the Kaplan-Meier method. The frequency and the severity of variceal rebleeding was significantly lower in the TIPSS group (9.8%), compared with the VBL group (51.9%) (P < .0006). Although mortality rates were not significantly different, 8 of the patients who rebled in the VBL group required TIPSS therapy for uncontrolled bleeding. No significant differences were found in the frequency of other complications such as encephalopathy and sepsis. Patients in the VBL group required significantly greater time in the intensive care unit during the period of this study (<0.03). The total direct cost of treatment incurred was pound sterling 1,373 ($2,200) per patient, the cost being less in the patients treated with TIPSS compared with VBL. The results of this study show that TIPSS is superior to VBL for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic
โœ George V. Papatheodoridis; John Goulis; Gioacchino Leandro; David Patch; Andrew ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 136 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Endoscopic treatment (ET) is frequently used to prevent variceal rebleeding but this still occurs in about 50% of patients. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been compared with ET in several trials. Using a meta-analysis, we evaluated randomized trials comparing TIPS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic
โœ Manuela Merli; Francesco Salerno; Oliviero Riggio; Roberto de Franchis; Franco F ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 89 KB

## Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), a new technique for the treatment of portal hypertension, has been successful in preliminary studies to treat acute variceal hemorrhage and to prevent variceal rebleeding. The purpose of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial is to co

Improved survival in patients receiving
โœ Gin-Ho Lo; Wen-Chi Chen; Chiun-Ku Lin; Wei-Lun Tsai; Hoi-Hung Chan; Tai-An Chen; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 287 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Both medical therapy and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have proven to be comparable in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, the long-term results are still lacking. Our previous study enrolled 121 patients with history of esophageal variceal bleeding and randomized to receive EVL (EV