๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A randomized multicenter trial of cyclophosphamide, Novantrone and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

โœ Scribed by John M. Bennett; Patrick Byrne; Ajit Desai; Charles White; Ronald DeConti; Charles Vogel; Edward Krementz; Franco Muggia; James Doroshow; David Plotkin; Harvey Golomb; Hyman Muss; Harvey Brodovsky; Richard Gams; Lee Roy Horgan; Shelley Bryant; Arnold Weiss; Kenneth Cartwright; Gary Dukart


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1985
Tongue
English
Weight
388 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-6997

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


As of August 1984, 115 women with advanced breast cancer have been randomized to receive a combination of either cyclophosphamide, Novantrone (mitoxantrone) and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) or cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and 5-fluorouracil (CAF). Seventy-one percent of all patients were post-, menopausal and 44% of CNF patients and 57% of CAF patients were estrogen receptor (ER) negative. Slightly ovcr 30% of all patients had received hormonal therapy or chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting.

Hematologic toxicity was similar in regard to platelet counts but slightly lower nadirs were experienced with CNF therapy than with CAF. However, there were fewer dosage decreases with CNF. Significantly lcss nausea and vomiting were observed with the CNF regimen compared to CAF. Moreover, alopecia was reduced appreciably in patients who reccived CNF.

The response rate to CNF for the first 38 eligible and evaluable patients was 42%, and for 53 eligible and evaluable patients who received CAF the response rate was 45%, a non-significant difference. Median response durations were similar also, 140 days for CNF and 168 days for the CAF regimen. Time to treatlnent failure was similar for both regimens.

CNF is an effective regimen for patients with advanced breast cancer, with less toxicity than CAF.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide
โœ Hyman B. Muss; Virginia Howard; Frederick Richards Ii; Douglas R. White; Don V. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 364 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Thirty-two evaluable patients with metastatic carcinoma of the prostate were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide (CYC) with a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). Progressive disease after endocrine manipulation was noted in 97% (3

The eastern cooperative oncology group e
โœ Geoffrey Falkson; Rebecca S. Gelman; Douglass C. Tormey; Frank J. Cummings; Paul ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 497 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Data on 162 women (90 premenopausal and 72 postmenopausal) with metastatic breast cancer randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) on two Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) protocols were analyzed. Twenty-three percent had complete remission; 39