๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of two formulations of cyclosporin, Neoral and Sandimmun, in patients with severe psoriasis

โœ Scribed by Koo; FOR THE OLP302 STUDY GROUP


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
787 KB
Volume
139
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-0963

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study compared the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of two formulations of cyclosporin, Sandimmun and Neoral, in patients with severe, chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to 24 weeks of treatment with Neoral (n = 152) or Sandimmun (n = 157). The starting dose of each formulation was 2.5 mg/kg per day. Dose increases to maintain efficacy were allowed after 4 weeks. In patients who achieved remission, the dose was down-titrated at 4-week intervals from week 16. The maximum permitted dose for each formulation was 5.0 mg/kg per day. Neoral produced a more rapid response than Sandimmun: remission rates were higher for Neoral during the first 8 weeks of treatment. The number of dose reductions for safety was similar in both treatment groups, but there were more dose increases to maintain efficacy in the Sandimmun group (198) than the Neoral group (146). The number of patients with dose reductions after week 16 was higher for Neoral (n = 83) than for Sandimmun (n = 73). The frequency and nature of adverse events were similar for both treatment groups. The mean dose required to control the disease was approximately 10% lower with Neoral and fewer dose changes were needed. The increased bioavailability and reduced pharmacokinetic variability of cyclosporin provided by the Neoral formulation may facilitate short-course, intermittent therapy.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A randomized, double-blind clinical tria
โœ Nicolino Ruperto; Irina Nikishina; Evgueni D. Pachanov; Ynessa Shachbazian; Anne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 122 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective In an international, multicenter, doubleโ€blind, randomized clinical trial we evaluated the shortโ€term (3 months) and longโ€term (12 months) efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of meloxicam oral suspension compared with the efficacy and safety of naproxen oral suspensio

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind,
โœ Bruno Dubois; Ian McKeith; Jean-Marc Orgogozo; Owen Collins; Didier Meulien ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 139 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Background. Metrifonate is a long-lasting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor being developed for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Objectives. This study compared the ecacy, tolerability and safety of two doses of metrifonate in patients with mild-to-moderate AD, over a 26-week tre

Direct comparison of two different mesal
โœ Hiroaki Ito; Mitsuo Iida; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasuo Suzuki; Hidetaka Sasaki; Toy ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 131 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Background: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. ## Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients wit

Direct comparison of two different mesal
โœ Hiroaki Ito; Mitsuo Iida; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasuo Suzuki; Yoshiyuki Aida; Toyo ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 240 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Background: Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC. ## Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, ran