๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A radioimmunoassay method for the rapid detection of Candida antibodies in experimental systemic candidiasis

โœ Scribed by Shyi Yi Huang; Charles W. Berry; Joseph T. Newman; William H. Cooper; Nannepaga Y. Zachariah


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
421 KB
Volume
67
Category
Article
ISSN
0301-486X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Rabbits were employed as experimental models to evaluate a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) method for the diagnosis of systemic candidiasis. Ten rabbits were inoculated subcutaneously to mimic superficial candidiasis and were found to produce no antibodies to Candida as determined by both immunodiffusion and RIA procedures. However, 94 per cent of 18 rabbits systemically infected by intravenous injection of Candida cells were observed to produce antibody as assessed by the RIA technique. These data encourage further tests with human sera and the continued development of this RIA procedure as a useful tool in the early serodiagnosis of systemic candidiasis.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Microplate elsa for detection of antibod
โœ M. Sutjita; A. Hohmann; M. L. Boey; J. Bradley ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 500 KB

A 96-well microplate ELISA for the detec-native E. coli DNA, calf thymus DNA, and tion of antibodies to DNA is described. A heat-denatured DNA. Using native E. coli number of buffers and precoating treat-DNA, virtually none of 35 normal sera had ments were used to evaluate the optimal any detectable

G test, a new direct method for diagnosi
โœ Takashige Miyazaki; Dr. Shigeru Kohno; Hironobu Koga; Mitsuo Kaku; Kotaro Mitsut ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 338 KB

## Abstract An indirect method to measure betaglucan, a major structural component of yeast cell walls, is available, but has the disadvantage of requiring the combined use of two assays. Recent reports describe the fungal index, which measures the difference between the conventional limulus test,