A quantitative analysis of matrix alignment in ligament scars: A comparison of movement versus immobilization in an immature rabbit model
✍ Scribed by Dr. C. Frank; B. MacFarlane; P. Edwards; R. Rangayyan; Z-Q. Liu; S. Walsh; R. Bray
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 912 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0736-0266
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
This investigation quantified the alignment of fibrillar matrix in normal rabbit medial collateral ligaments (MCLs) and in healing MCLs from animals treated with or without knee immobilization. Twenty‐four immature female rabbits were given complete midsubstance injuries to their right MCLs. Fifteen of them had that knee pin immobilized in flexion, while the remaining nine were allowed unrestricted cage activity. Animals were sacrificed in groups of three at intervals of 3, 6, or 14 weeks after injury, and both healing MCLs and unoperated contralateral controls were fixed in situ for subsequent removal, freeze‐fracture, and preparation for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A random sampling of SEM photographs followed by atuomated, statistically validated image processing was used to quantify alignment of matrix in all samples. Results showed that nonimmobilized MCL scars in this model do remodel over 14 weeks of healing, returning to normal alignment values in that time. Surprisingly, MCL scars in immobilized knees were even better, with mean matrix alignments falling statistically within normal MCL limits at all healing intervals studied. If not due to an unknown sampling or fixation artifact, these results suggest that gross knee flexion and extension is not a prerequisite for scar matrix alignment in this immature model of ligament healing.