A qualitative comparison of two contrast media for cerebral angiography. A clinical method
✍ Scribed by H. O. M. Thijssen; B. Ike; S. P. Strijk; E. J. Colon
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1979
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 467 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0028-3940
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A qualitative comparison of two contrast media for cerebral angiography with regard to contrast should, preferably, be based on a comparison made in two different hemispheres of one patient. Two problems then arise which made evaluation difficult. Vasodilation occurs after the first contrast injection as a result of which the second contrast medium to be compared flows into a dilated vascular tree. In addition, in the case of a comparison in two different hemispheres, variations of image geometry occur, resulting in differences of sharpness and contrast. The method of solving these problems is discussed and is illustrated by a comparison of two contrast media which might be expected to produce differences in contrast because of their physical properties. The results of this clinical comparison show that the expected differences can be partly demonstrated.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the results and reproducibility of two MR‐based methods of measuring the cerebrovascular response (CVR). ## Materials and Methods In eight volunteers, CVR was assessed with two MR‐based methods upon a challenge with acetazolamide. CVR was assessed by measuring c
## Abstract It is important to compare different contrast media used in bone cement according to their ability to attenuate X‐rays and thereby produce image contrast between bone cement and its surroundings in clinical applications. The radiopacity of bone cement is often evaluated by making radiog
First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the image quality of matched‐filtered two‐dimensional projection magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and elliptical centric‐ordered (EC) three‐dimensional MRA. ## Materials and Methods Signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) of matched‐filtered two‐dimensional projection