✦ LIBER ✦

A quadratically-convergent fixed-point algorithm for economic equilibria and linearly constrained optimization

✍ Scribed by Michael J. Todd

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1980
Tongue: English
Weight: 843 KB
Volume: 18
Category: Article
ISSN: 0025-5610
DOI: 10.1007/bf01588307

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A quadratically convergent global algori

A quadratically convergent global algorithm for the linearly-constrained minimum cross-entropy problem

✍ S.C. Fang; H.S.J. Tsao 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 720 KB

A trust-region and affine scaling algori

A trust-region and affine scaling algorithm for linearly constrained optimization

✍ Chen Zhongwen; Zhang Xiangsun 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 SP Science China Press 🌐 English ⚖ 181 KB

Convergence to a second-order point of a

Convergence to a second-order point of a trust-region algorithm with a nonmonotonic penalty parameter for constrained optimization

✍ M. M. El-Alem 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 855 KB

A globally and superlinearly convergent

A globally and superlinearly convergent primal-dual interior point trust region method for large scale constrained optimization

✍ Hiroshi Yamashita; Hiroshi Yabe; Takahito Tanabe 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 302 KB

Strong convergence theorems by a new hyb

Strong convergence theorems by a new hybrid projection algorithm for fixed point problems and equilibrium problems of two relatively quasi-nonexpansive mappings

✍ Kriengsak Wattanawitoon; Poom Kumam 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 569 KB

Corrigendum to: “Strong convergence theo

Corrigendum to: “Strong convergence theorems by a new hybrid projection algorithm for fixed point problems and equilibrium problems of two relatively quasi-nonexpansive mappings” [Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 3 (2009) 11–20]

✍ Kriengsak Wattanawitoon; Poom Kumam 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB

The authors regret that the above-referenced paper contains a number of misprints. In the statement of Theorem 3.1 (Eq. (3.1)) the condition C n+1 is incorrect. In fact, the set C n+1 in Theorem 3.1 should be replaced by the following one: The proof on page 15 line 5 should be inserted with the fol