1998) recently reported a moderately strong correlation between Hare's (1991) Psychopathy ChecklistΒ±Revised (PCL-R) and a newly developed self-report measure of psychopathy, the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) of Lilienfeld and Andrews (1996), in an ethnically diverse sample of 50 inmates f
A prospective comparison of two measures of psychopathy in the prediction of institutional misconduct
β Scribed by John F. Edens; Norman G. Poythress Jr; Scott O. Lilienfeld; Christopher J. Patrick,
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 106 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
- DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.823
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
This study examined the predictive validity of two widely used measures of psychopathic traits, the Psychopathy ChecklistβRevised (PCLβR; Hare, 2003) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI; Lilienfeld & Andrews, 1996). Records of institutional infractions were obtained for a young adult sample of prison inmates (Nβ=β46), who were followed for approximately two years following administration of these two scales. The PPI total and two factor scores predicted the total number of infractions committed (r ranging from .28 to .36). PPI Factor I showed some evidence of stronger associations with nonβaggressive infractions (rβ=β.36), whereas PPI Factor II was the strongest correlate of aggressive misconduct (rβ=β.24). The total and facet scores of the PCLβR were not significantly predictive of any form of institutional misconduct, with effect sizes ranging from negligible to small (median rβ=β.14, r ranging from β.01 to .21). Copyright Β© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
While numerous studies attest to a relationship between academic self-concept and achievement, a variety o f measures of self-concept have been used, and the equivalence o f these instruments has received limited attention. In this investigation, the Self-concept of Ability Scale (SCAS) and the newe
Investigators often report results of studies comparing the proportions of subjects who have clinically meaningful responses to various therapeutic regimens. When the outcome variable is a continuous measure this involves dichotomizing the observed response based on a prede"ned threshold value. The