๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A pressure management system for the neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury

โœ Scribed by E. J. McGuire; F. Noll; F. Maynard


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
545 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0733-2467

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


One hundred eighteen patients consecutively admitted to a University Rehabilitation Program entered a protocol study of urologic management. Bladder pressures were kept below 30 cms/H,O by urologic treatment. Serial urodynamic, radiographic, bacteriologic, and endoscopic studies were performed at regular intervals. Eighteen patients have been lost to follow-up; 100 patients were followed for a mean 25.4 months with a range of 6 months to 56 months. There were 105 patients with lesions superior to thc sacral segments and 13 patients with low lesions. At discharge 11 patients were voiding normally, 105 were continent on an intermittent catheterization (1C) protocol, and 2 patients used condom catheter drainage following sphincterotomy. Bacterial cultures and urinalysis data showed little or no relationship to clinical outcome, and treatment for 387 weeks by antimicrobial agents was not associated with discernible benefit as opposed to no treatment. Five patients developed bladder calculi, and five developed unilateral epididymitis. Bladder pressure was rrlatively easy to control following spinal cord injury, a result which suggests that high bladder pressure is not a direct result of the neural injury, but rather an evolutionary change as a result of bladder and urethral interactive dysfunction.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Optimal treatment for severe neurogenic
โœ J. C. Furlan; D. R. Urbach; M. G. Fehlings ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 314 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background When conservative management fails in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction, clinicians have to choose from a variety of treatment options which include colostomy, ileostomy, Malone anterograde continence enema (MACE) and sacral a