๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A Practical Manual of Diabetes in Pregnancy (McCance/A Practical Manual of Diabetes in Pregnancy) || Rationale for Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy

โœ Scribed by McCance, David R.; Maresh, Michael; Sacks, David A.


Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Year
2010
Weight
712 KB
Edition
1
Category
Article
ISBN
140517904X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


ultrasound scans of head circumference at 31, 33, 35, and 37 weeks were all at the 75th centile, but the abdominal circumferences were on the 97th centile at 31 and 33 weeks, and on the 90th centile at 35 and 37 weeks. This suggests a positive response to the insulin prescription in preventing a recurrence of fetal overgrowth. The infant was delivered following induction of labour at 38 weeks of gestation, and was at 3.8 kg, the 90th centile for gestational age, and had no neonatal morbidity. This case illustrates a successful use of GDM screening and a positive response to targeted insulin therapy.

โ€ข What evidence is there for adverse effects on the fetus of hyperglycemia in the second half of pregnancy? โ€ข What evidence is there for the modifi cation of these adverse effects by treatment aimed at reducing hyperglycemia? โ€ข What are the roles of diet therapy, insulin, and/or oral hypoglycemic agents in the control of hyperglycemia?


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Practical Manual of Diabetes in Pregna
โœ McCance, David R.; Maresh, Michael; Sacks, David A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Wiley-Blackwell โš– 514 KB

A 28 -year -old woman with a 23 -year history of Type 1 diabetes and a 2 -year history of diabetic nephropathy presented in her fi rst pregnancy. BP (114/75 mmHg) and serum creatinine were normal, but urinary albumin excretion was elevated at 941 mg/24 h on an ACE inhibitor and diuretic treatment. S

A Practical Manual of Diabetes in Pregna
โœ McCance, David R.; Maresh, Michael; Sacks, David A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Wiley-Blackwell โš– 599 KB

mostly close to target and HbA1c was 6.6%. However, after that visit she failed to attend for her scheduled joint diabetes antenatal clinic review appointments and could not be contacted by the diabetes specialist midwife or her family doctor. On initial assessment her pulse was 118 bpm, blood pres