In part I of this investigation, we proved that the standard a posteriori estimates, based only on local computations, may severely underestimate the exact error for the classes of wave-numbers and the types of meshes employed in engineering analyses. We showed that this is due to the fact that the
A posteriori error estimation for finite element solutions of Helmholtz’ equation. part I: the quality of local indicators and estimators
✍ Scribed by I. Babuška; F. Ihlenburg; T. Strouboulis; S. K. Gangaraj
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 271 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0029-5981
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
This paper contains a first systematic analysis of a posteriori estimation for finite element solutions of the Helmholtz equation. In this first part, it is shown that the standard a posteriori estimates, based only on local computations, severely underestimate the exact error for the classes of wave numbers and the types of meshes employed in engineering analysis. This underestimation can be explained by observing that the standard error estimators cannot detect one component of the error, the pollution error, which is very significant at high wave numbers. Here, a rigorous analysis is carried out on a one-dimensional model problem. The analytical results for the residual estimator are illustrated and further investigated by numerical evaluation both for a residual estimator and for the ZZ-estimator based on smoothening. In the second part, reliable a posteriori estimators of the pollution error will be constructed.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A Neumann subproblem a posteriori finite element procedure for the efficient and accurate calculation of rigorous, constant-free upper and lower bounds for non-linear outputs of the Helmholtz equation in two-dimensional exterior domains is presented. The bound procedure is firstly formulated, with p