Ncuropsych iat ric Rcscai-ch Unit Medical Rcrcnrch Council Laboratories W o odni nns t c rn c Ron tl Carshalton, Szirrcy United Kzngdom Something to Build On I've gone over your first-issue inaterial and find it exciting. Hope subsequent issues will prove as valuable. There is a real need being fill
A plea for she
โ Scribed by Jerry G. Blaivas
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 5 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0733-2467
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
As a writer, I am often confronted with the need to make reference to a genderless person such as a surgeon, internist, urologist, etc. It gets boring to repeat the appellation each time and that, I suppose, is the genesis of the words he and she. If you think about it, these words are simply shortcuts or abbreviations for the longer nouns that they represent. That's fine and these words are very useful, but, at present, the genderless substitute for he and she (it) is not socially acceptable. You can't really say ''I went to my doctor and it examined me.'' Even more politically unacceptable is to use the word ''he'' as a generic substitute for ''he'' and ''she.'' You can't say ''I went to my doctor and he examined me'' unless you can prove that the person who examined you was, in fact, a man.
I'm personally content using the word ''he'' to represent both sexes as a shortcut. It makes sense to me; after all, ''mankind'' is still acceptable (I think). Unfortunately, it's not politically correct and whenever I do that, the medical editor changes ''he'' to ''he or she.''
The problem, so far as I can see, is that ''he'' doesn't have a ''she'' in it. However, ''she (''s-he'') does have a ''he'' in it. To solve the problem, why don't we just use ''she'' as the genderless person. Then it would be OK to say ''I went to the doctor and she examined me,'' and we'd all know that she could be either he or she. I'm not serious about this!
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
From the author of the international bestseller *What I Loved,* a provocative collection of autobiographical and critical essays about writing and writers. Whether her subject is growing up in Minnesota, cross-dressing, or the novel, Hustvedt's nonfiction, like her fiction, defies easy categori
Although as scientists, we tend to eschew truisms, few would challenge the claim that a scientific field can be no better than the tools it uses to derive knowledge. After all, just as a builder cannot rise a 50-story skyscraper without a suitably tall crane, and a French chef cannot bake a flaky cr