## Abstract The present study was designed to evaluate possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between buspirone administered repeatedly and triazolam given acutely. Ten healthy male volunteers participated in the study and received 0.25 mg of triazolam orally after a oneβweek pre
A pharmacodynamic study of quazepam and triazolam
β Scribed by G. Casucci; A. di Costanzo; R. Riva; S. Allocca; G. Tedeschi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 499 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
A doubleβblind single oral dose study in 10 healthy volunteers was performed during the day to compare the diurnal effects of quazepam (15 mg) and triazolam (0.25 mg) on psychomotor performance. The central effect of the two benzodiazepines was assessed by means of a computer analysis of visually guided saccadic eye movements (SEM), critical flicker fusion threshold (CFFT), and choice reaction time (CRT). The results obtained suggest that: computer analysis of SEM is more sensitive than CRT and CFFT to detect sedative drug effects at a subclinical level; the presumed equipotent doses of quazepam and triazolam tested do not show the same sedative activity; the minimal impairment produced by quazepam on CNS function does not seem to be related to the property to bind to BZ1 receptors; the pharmacodynamic profile of quazepam seems to be characteristic of a βnonβsedativeβ agent, while triazolam behaves as a βsedativeβ benzodiazepine.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A case of abuse of triazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, was experienced. A 35-year-old male, with a tendency to mixed drug dependence with nitrazepam, etc., and a background of neurotic anxiety and insomnia, started self-administration of triazolam. Application of triazolam was frequent, with l
This double-blind randomized, crossover study was undertaken to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of nifedipine retard and atenolol when given separately, as a free or a fixed combination, compared with placebo in 15 healthy male volunteers. There was no difference between the three atenolol