Niou's note (1987) on Nanson's rule for determining a winner from voters' preference rankings accuses several people, including Fishburn (1977), of misstating Nanson's rule. He says, for example, that I (1977: 473) describe the rule thus: Nanson's function is a Borda elimination procedure. At each
β¦ LIBER β¦
A note on Whitham's Rule
β Scribed by Chisnell, R. F.
- Book ID
- 120114005
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Year
- 1965
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 61 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-1120
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A note on βA note on Nanson's ruleβ
β
P. C. Fishburn
π
Article
π
1990
π
Springer US
π
English
β 50 KB
A Note on "A Note on Nanson's Rule"
β
P. C. Fishburn
π
Article
π
1990
π
Springer US
π
English
β 139 KB
The Brinkley-Kirkwood theory and Whitham
β
P. L. Sachdev
π
Article
π
1970
π
Springer
π
English
β 298 KB
The shock-expansion method and Whitham's
β
Lick, Wilbert
π
Article
π
1966
π
Cambridge University Press
π
English
β 140 KB
A note on Nanson's rule
β
Emerson M. S. Niou
π
Article
π
1987
π
Springer US
π
English
β 120 KB
E.J. Nanson, in 1883, proposed a voting rule designed mainly to select the Condorcet winner. Unfortunately, much of the collective choice literature has misstated Nanson's rule. This note shows that the misstated versions of the rule and Nanson's actual rule can yield different outcomes, and it prov
A note on Hotelling's rule
β
Andreas Pfingsten
π
Article
π
1986
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 162 KB