✦ LIBER ✦

A note on the Sobolev inequality

✍ Scribed by Gabriele Bianchi; Henrik Egnell

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1991
Tongue: English
Weight: 293 KB
Volume: 100
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-1236
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1236(91)90099-q

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A note on Sobolev type inequalities in t

A note on Sobolev type inequalities in two independent variables

✍ B.G Pachpatte 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 284 KB

NOTE A Note on the Hardy–Hilbert Inequal

NOTE A Note on the Hardy–Hilbert Inequality

✍ Gao Mingzhe 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB

In this note, it is shown that the Hardy᎐Hilbert inequality for double series can Ž . be improved by introducing a proper weight function of the form rsin rp y Ž . 1y1rr Ž Ž . . O n rn with O n ) 0 into either of the two single summations. When r r r s 2, the classical Hilbert inequality is improved

A Note on Fisher's Inequality

✍ Douglas R. Woodall 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

A new proof is given of the nonuniform version of Fisher's inequality, first proved by Majumdar. The proof is ``elementary,'' in the sense of being purely combinatorial and not using ideas from linear algebra. However, no nonalgebraic proof of the n-dimensional analogue of this result (Theorem 3 her

The John-Nirenberg Inequality and a Sobo

The John-Nirenberg Inequality and a Sobolev Inequality in General Domains

✍ R. Hurrisyrjanen 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 235 KB

Note on Certain Inequality

✍ Ivica Gusić 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

Using only the elementary properties of lattice-ordered groups, we give a simple w x proof of the inequality of Maligranda and Orlicz 2 in full generality.

Note on the Ahlswede-Daykin inequality

✍ Klaus Reuter 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 178 KB

Given a finite boolean lattice L and four functions tr, fl, y, 6 of L to the nonnegative reals with oc(x)fl(y) <~ y(x v y)6(x A y) for all x, y e L. We show that Here x' denotes the complement of x and X v X' stands for {Xl v x~ I xl, x2 e X). This inequality turns out to be equivalent in a certain