✦ LIBER ✦

A note on the origin of the term “nature and nurture”: Not Shakespeare and Galton, but Mulcaster

✍ Scribed by Karl Halvor Teigen

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 109 KB
Volume: 20
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-5061
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6696(198410)20:4<363::aid-jhbs2300200406>3.0.co;2-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Not Galton, but Shakespeare: A note on t

Not Galton, but Shakespeare: A note on the origin of the term “nature and nurture”

✍ James J. Conley 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB 👁 2 views

A note on the origin of the term “nature

A note on the origin of the term “nature and nurture”

✍ Raymond E. Fancher 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB 👁 2 views

A note on the origin of the term “social

A note on the origin of the term “social science”

✍ Fred R. Shapiro 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 187 KB 👁 2 views

The previous literature concerning the origin of the term social science has traced the earliest usage of the English phrase to J. S. Mill in 1829 and of the French science sociale to Charles Fourier in 1808. A prior, albeit vague, employment of the term is found in a 1785 letter by John Adams. In a