✦ LIBER ✦

A Note on the "Is-Ought" Barrier

✍ Scribed by Marvin Zimmerman

Book ID: 124839278
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 1967
Tongue: English
Weight: 175 KB
Volume: 76
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-4423
DOI: 10.2307/2251783

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A note on John R. Searle's derivation of

A note on John R. Searle's derivation of ‘ought’ from ‘is’

✍ Ofstad, Harald; Bergström, Lars 📂 Article 📅 1965 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 308 KB

Hume on "Is" and "Ought"

✍ A. C. MacIntyre 📂 Article 📅 1959 🏛 Duke University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 370 KB

The is-ought dichotomy: A modest proposa

The is-ought dichotomy: A modest proposal

✍ James E. Tomberlin 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 162 KB

This thesis, or something very much like it, has been accepted by a great many philosophers. And it has been denied by a number of other philosophers. Unfortunately, most discussions of the thesis have not been as clear as they could have been. The purpose of the present paper is to make a modest pr

Note on the transparency of a potential

Note on the transparency of a potential barrier

✍ Jeffreys, Bertha 📂 Article 📅 1942 🏛 Cambridge University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 565 KB

Hume on "Is" and "Ought": A Reply to Mr.

Hume on "Is" and "Ought": A Reply to Mr. MacIntyre

✍ R. F. Atkinson 📂 Article 📅 1961 🏛 Duke University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Are ‘is’ to ‘ought’ deductions fallaciou

Are ‘is’ to ‘ought’ deductions fallacious? on a Humean formal argument

✍ J. L. A. Garcia 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 663 KB