In [4] Jung and Watkins proved that for a connected infinite graph X either rยฎ(X) = oo holds or X is a strip, if Aut(X) contains a transitive abelian subgroup G. Here we prove the same result under weaker assumptions.
A note on the growth of transitive graphs
โ Scribed by W. Imrich; N. Seifter
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 810 KB
- Volume
- 73
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Let X be a locally finite, connected, growth if and only if X is a strip. infinite, transitive graph. We show that X has linear X(V, E) denotes a graph with vertex-set V(X) and edge-set E(X). Graphs considered in this paper contain neither loops nor mu!tiple edges, AUT(X) denotes the automorphism group of X. We say a subgroup G of AUT(X) acts transitively on X if there is an Q! E G to every x, y E V(X) such that a(x) = y.
Two one-way infinite paths P and Q are equivalent in X, in symbols P hX there is a third path R which meets both of them infinitely often. The equivalence classes with respect to -x are called ends ([5], p. 127). n(E) denotes the maximal number of disjoint one-way infinite paths of an end E E E(X), where E(X) is the set of ends of X. It has been shown by Halin [3,4] that this number always exists.
AutomoThisms not stabilizing any finite, nonempty subgraph are called automorphisms of type 2 by Halin [2; p. 2511. To every automorphism (Y of type 2 there exists an a-invariant two-sided infinite path P ]2; Th. 7j. (A infinite path will be called a 2-path.) Since cy is of type 2 its action on translation. Let v be a vertex of P and P' the one-sided infinite subpath of containing 21, cyu, a%, . . . , etc. Then the end containing P' is called the direction of cy.
The boundary aC of C c V(X) is the set of v adjacent to vertices of C. A connected grap connected set C c V(X) and an automorphis 00, cu(C U K) s C and C\a(C) is finite.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This note provides counter-examples to a conjecture of D.A. Holton on stability of graphs. It is shown that even though the automorphism groups of two graphs are identical, one may be stable while the other is not.