I forward results of two option pricing models: (1) the Black and !%holes (1973) model and (2) the Black (1976) model. I argued that if the assumptions underlying the original 1973 Black-Scholes model for stock options held for commodities, their equation would also hold for commodity options as wel
A note on the design of commodity option contracts
โ Scribed by Michael R. Asay
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 443 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A Futures Trading Commission is ready to consider seriously the buying and selling of commodity options on domestic futures exchanges. It is therefore useful to examine the desirable characteristics such options might possess, and that is the purpose of this article. First, the "standard" commodity option, as defined and analyzed by , is reviewed; and some unattractive analytic and operational features of this design are noted. Then an alternative design, which avoids these drawbacks, is proposed.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
n his note in the spring 1982 issue of this journal, Asay (1982) discusses the I pricing of commodity option contracts. The purpose of his note is to introduce the idea of a "futures" option, which, like a standard futures contract, requires no money up-front and is "marked to market" at the end of
## Abstract The value of a compound option, __an option on an option__, has been derived by Geske (1976) using Fourier integrals. This article presents two alternative proofs to derive the value of a compound option. One proof is based on the martingale approach, which provides a simple and powerfu
This note compares the valuation of a "lookback" put option with that of an option which, at payoff, gives its holder the difference between the maximum value recorded during the option's life and an initial value based on underlying asset price at the time of initiation. This latter instrument is c
Azriel Levy ## Introduction everal authors have shown that the theoretical relationship between forward and fu-S tures prices depends primarily on the assumptions regarding the stochastic process of interest rates (Cox, et. al. (1981); Richard and Sundaresan (1981); Jarrow and Oldfield (1981); an