## Abstract This note examines the effect of loss aversion on the futures trading behavior of a short hedger. Using a modified constantβabsoluteβriskβaversion utility function, I show that loss aversion has no effect in an unbiased futures market. It has different, predictable impacts when the futu
A note on asymmetric stochastic volatility and futures hedging
β Scribed by Donald Lien
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 82 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This note incorporates asymmetric responses to good and bad news within a stochastic volatility framework. It is shown that the asymmetry leads to a greater average optimal hedge ratio. Moreover, the ratio increases with increasing degree of asymmetry. On the other hand, asymmetry has no impact on the hedging performance. The result is consistent with the empirical finding of Brooks, Henry, and Persand (2002) where GARCH models are employed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
T w o recent studies [Hill and Schneeweis (H&S) (forthcoming) and Dale (1981)l
The conventional approach applies an estimated optimal hedge ratio to evaluate and compare hedging performance. This note shows that the approach produces a biased result. Moreover, it tends to underestimate the true hedging performance.
In many empirical studies, both spot and futures prices were shown to contain a stochastic trend. Consequently, it is necessary to examine the possible cointegration relationship between the two prices as suggested by the efficient markets hypothesis. The importance of incorporating the cointegratio