𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Nonstandard Delta Function in a Predicative Theory

✍ Scribed by Peter Zahn


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
191 KB
Volume
41
Category
Article
ISSN
0044-3050

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In [1] Todorov has shown by means of axiomatic set theory that there exists a nonstandard function Ξ”: *ℝ^n^ β†’ * β„‚ such that for all continuous functions Ο†: ℝ^n^ β†’ β„‚,
equation image
.

Here *ℝ and *β„‚ are the set of the nonstandard real numbers and the set of the nonstandard complex numbers, respectively, and *Ο†: *ℝ^n^ β†’ *β„‚ is the nonstandard extension of Ο† In the present note we want to prove an analogous theorem by predicative means only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A nonstandard proof of a lemma from cons
✍ David A. Ross πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 90 KB

## Abstract Suppose that __f~n~__ is a sequence of nonnegative functions with compact support on a locally compact metric space, that __T__ is a nonnegative linear functional, and that $ \sum ^\infty \_{n=1}$ __T f~n~__ < __T f~0~__. A result of Bishop, foundational to a constructive theory of func

Theory of barrierless electronic relaxat
✍ Nalini Chakravarti; K.L. Sebastian πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 561 KB

We give a general method for Ending the exact solution for the problem of electronic relaxation in solution, modelled by a particle undergoing diffusive motion in a potential in the presence of a delta function sink. The diffusive motion is described by the Smoluchowski equation and the sink could b

The Elementary Theory of Torsionfree Abe
✍ Peter H. Schmitt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 367 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

This is proved by induction on 7n. For ni = 0 (\*) follows immediately from the definitions. Now take a E C,:,,, for m > 0. There is c E B,,,, such t'hat ac E pCp,n,-l + + C,,;f,l+l. There is thus a' E Cl~.flr-l with a E c + pa' + Cl,.,,f+l. By induction hypothesis a' E 6' + C,.,,, for some b' E @ B