## Abstract It is well known that __S__ ^1^~2~ cannot prove the injective weak pigeonhole principle for polynomial time functions unless RSA is insecure. In this note we investigate the provability of the surjective (dual) weak pigeonhole principle in __S__ ^1^~2~ for provably weaker function class
A New Proof of the Weak Pigeonhole Principle
β Scribed by Alexis Maciel; Toniann Pitassi; Alan R. Woods
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 213 KB
- Volume
- 64
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-0000
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The exact complexity of the weak pigeonhole principle is an old and fundamental problem in proof complexity. Using a diagonalization argument, J. B. Paris et al. (J. Symbolic Logic 53 (1988), 1235-1244) showed how to prove the weak pigeonhole principle with bounded-depth, quasipolynomialsize proofs. Their argument was further refined by J. KrajΔ± Β΄c Λek (J. Symbolic Logic 59 (1994), 73-86). In this paper, we present a new proof: we show that the weak pigeonhole principle has quasipolynomial-size LK proofs where every formula consists of a single AND/OR of polylog fan-in. Our proof is conceptually simpler than previous arguments, and is optimal with respect to depth.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
For free and interacting Hamiltonians, Ho and H = H,, + V(r) acting in L2(R3, dx) with V(r) a radial potential satisfying certain technical conditions, and for 9) a real function on R with v' > 0 except on a discrete set, we prove that the Moller wave operators Q\* = strong limit eiWHJ e-ifVtHo) t-?