Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to represent two kinds of interaction between arguments: support and conflict. In this paper, we turn a bipolar argumentation framework into a meta-argumentation framework where conflicts occur between sets of arguments, characterized as coalitions of supporti
β¦ LIBER β¦
A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
β Scribed by Leila Amgoud; Srdjan Vesic
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 653 KB
- Volume
- 63
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1012-2443
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Coalitions of arguments: A tool for hand
β
Claudette Cayrol; Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex
π
Article
π
2010
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 198 KB
A new approach to manipulation arguments
β
Patrick Todd
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 117 KB
Preference-based choice functions: a gen
β
Sven Ove Hansson
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 227 KB
Frameworks: a community-based approach t
β
Kristine Baber; Gretchen Bean
π
Article
π
2009
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 141 KB
## Abstract Few youth suicide prevention programs are theory based and systematically evaluated. This study evaluated the pilot implementation of a communityβbased youth suicide prevention project guided by an ecological perspective. One hundred fiftyβseven adults representing various constituencie
Problem-based learning and argumentation
β
Brian R. Belland; Krista D. Glazewski; Jennifer C. Richardson
π
Article
π
2010
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 517 KB
A new argument for skepticism
β
Baron Reed
π
Article
π
2008
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 166 KB