𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A multipoint method for meta-analysis of genetic association studies

✍ Scribed by Pantelis G. Bagos; Theodore D. Liakopoulos


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
207 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Meta‐analyses of genetic association studies are usually performed using a single polymorphism at a time, even though in many cases the individual studies report results from partially overlapping sets of polymorphisms. We present here a multipoint (or multilocus) method for multivariate meta‐analysis of published population‐based case‐control association studies. The method is derived by extending the general method for multivariate meta‐analysis and allows for multivariate modelling of log(odds ratios (OR)) derived from several polymorphisms that are in linkage disequilibrium (LD). The method is presented in a genetic model‐free approach, although it can also be used by assuming a genetic model of inheritance beforehand. Furthermore, the method is presented in a unified framework and is easily applied to both discrete outcomes (using the OR), as well as to meta‐analyses of a continuous outcome (using the mean difference). The main innovation of the method is the analytical calculation of the within‐studies covariances between estimates derived from linked polymorphisms. The only requirement is that of an external estimate for the degree of pairwise LD between the polymorphisms under study, which can be obtained from the same published studies, from the literature or from HapMap. Thus, the method is quite simple and fast, it can be extended to an arbitrary set of polymorphisms and can be fitted in nearly all statistical packages (Stata, R/Splus and SAS). Applications in two already published meta‐analyses provide encouraging results concerning the robustness and the usefulness of the method and we expect that it would be widely used in the future. Genet. Epidemiol. 34: 702‐715, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bayesian semiparametric meta-analysis fo
✍ Maria De Iorio; Paul J. Newcombe; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Claudio J. Verzilli; John 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB 👁 1 views

We present a Bayesian semiparametric model for the meta-analysis of candidate gene studies with a binary outcome. Such studies often report results from association tests for different, possibly study-specific and non-overlapping genetic markers in the same genetic region. Meta-analyses of the resul

Optimal methods for meta-analysis of gen
✍ Baiyu Zhou; Jianxin Shi; Alice S. Whittemore 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB 👁 2 views

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies involves testing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using summary statistics that are weighted sums of site-specific score or Wald statistics. This approach avoids having to pool individual-level data. We describe the weights that maximize the pow

A comparison of analytical methods for g
✍ Alison A. Motsinger-Reif; David M. Reif; Theresa J. Fanelli; Marylyn D. Ritchie 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 280 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The explosion of genetic information over the last decade presents an analytical challenge for genetic association studies. As the number of genetic variables examined per individual increases, both variable selection and statistical modeling tasks must be performed during analysis. Whi

A comparison of analytical methods for g
✍ Alison A. Motsinger-Reif; David M. Reif; Theresa J. Fanelli; Marylyn D. Ritchie 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB 👁 1 views

on page 771, in the middle of the right hand column, the numerator on the right side of the equation should be squared and should read as follows: E½n i :

Meta-analysis of genetic association stu
✍ Karen N. Conneely; Michael Boehnke 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 188 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Meta‐analysis has become a key component of well‐designed genetic association studies due to the boost in statistical power achieved by combining results across multiple samples of individuals and the need to validate observed associations in independent studies. Meta‐analyses of geneti